NAC vs. NVLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX).
NAC is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 1, 1998. NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009.
Performance
NAC vs. NVLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NAC vs. NVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAC Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund | 0.49% | 13.09% | 8.67% | 4.47% | -25.66% | 7.62% | 6.29% | 22.27% | -6.23% | 6.79% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -14.74% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAC achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than NVLIX's -14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, NAC has underperformed NVLIX with an annualized return of 2.00%, while NVLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.
NAC
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- 11.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
NVLIX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -14.74%
- 6M
- -14.11%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NAC vs. NVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NVLIX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NAC vs. NVLIX — Risk / Return Rank
NAC
NVLIX
NAC vs. NVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAC | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.29 | +1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 0.58 | +1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.08 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 0.15 | +1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 0.49 | +5.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAC | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.29 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.42 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.69 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.73 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between NAC and NVLIX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NAC vs. NVLIX - Dividend Comparison
NAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, less than NVLIX's 26.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAC Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund | 7.57% | 7.47% | 6.63% | 4.03% | 5.47% | 4.18% | 4.17% | 4.38% | 5.34% | 5.54% | 6.25% | 6.05% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 26.33% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
Drawdowns
NAC vs. NVLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAC drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, which is greater than NVLIX's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAC and NVLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAC | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -39.57% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -19.01% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.31% | -39.57% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | -39.57% | +3.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.72% | -19.01% | +13.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -6.20% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 5.81% | -3.75% |
Volatility
NAC vs. NVLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) is 3.62%, while Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that NAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NAC | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 5.48% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.75% | 12.08% | -6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.99% | 22.64% | -13.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 22.35% | -11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.27% | 21.97% | -9.70% |