MZZ vs. TSMX
MZZ (ProShares UltraShort MidCap400) and TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MZZ is passively managed, while TSMX is actively managed. Over the past year, MZZ returned -35.66% vs 324.82% for TSMX. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. MZZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSMX.
Performance
MZZ vs. TSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MZZ achieves a -22.57% return, which is significantly lower than TSMX's 94.10% return.
MZZ
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -22.57%
- 6M
- -23.66%
- 1Y
- -35.66%
- 3Y*
- -23.59%
- 5Y*
- -16.74%
- 10Y*
- -25.27%
TSMX
- 1D
- 4.81%
- 1M
- 23.50%
- YTD
- 94.10%
- 6M
- 108.35%
- 1Y
- 324.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MZZ vs. TSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 | -22.57% | -14.68% | -1.83% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 94.10% | 81.48% | 14.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MZZ and TSMX is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | -0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MZZ vs. TSMX — Risk / Return Rank
MZZ
TSMX
MZZ vs. TSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MZZ | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | 4.58 | -5.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | 3.97 | -5.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.48 | -0.67 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 9.49 | -10.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.73 | 31.06 | -32.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MZZ | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | 4.58 | -5.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | 1.65 | -2.25 |
Drawdowns
MZZ vs. TSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MZZ drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than TSMX's maximum drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZZ and TSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MZZ | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.90% | -63.80% | -36.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.22% | -34.93% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | 0.00% | -99.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.07% | -15.88% | -70.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.39% | 10.67% | +9.72% |
Volatility
MZZ vs. TSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) is 8.88%, while Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) has a volatility of 22.31%. This indicates that MZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MZZ | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | 22.31% | -13.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.99% | 54.31% | -31.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.15% | 71.46% | -40.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.16% | 80.94% | -41.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.39% | 80.94% | -39.55% |
MZZ vs. TSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MZZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MZZ vs. TSMX - Dividend Comparison
MZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than TSMX's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 | 6.70% | 5.27% | 6.36% | 4.52% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 1.53% | 0.53% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 4.25% | 8.01% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MZZ and TSMX have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMX has higher volatility (22.31%) compared to MZZ (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MZZ dropped -99.90% vs TSMX's -63.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSMX leads with 324.82% vs -35.66% for MZZ. On fees, MZZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MZZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMX has performed better with a 324.82% return vs -35.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MZZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSMX.
MZZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 4.25% for TSMX.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MZZ and 1.05% for TSMX.
TSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.58 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MZZ and TSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer