MZZ vs. PLUL
MZZ (ProShares UltraShort MidCap400) and PLUL (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - MZZ tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (-200%) while PLUL tracks the Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. MZZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLUL.
Performance
MZZ vs. PLUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MZZ
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- -16.58%
- YTD
- -23.67%
- 1Y
- -30.02%
- 3Y*
- -20.04%
- 5Y*
- -17.51%
- 10Y*
- -24.70%
- ALL TIME*
- -26.24%
PLUL
- 1D
- 12.71%
- 1M
- -38.92%
- 6M
- -39.94%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MZZ vs. PLUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 | -16.17% |
PLUL Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF | -38.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between MZZ and PLUL is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MZZ vs. PLUL — Risk / Return Rank
MZZ
PLUL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MZZ vs. PLUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MZZ | PLUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MZZ vs. PLUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MZZ drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than PLUL's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZZ and PLUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MZZ | PLUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.90% | -75.83% | -24.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -72.76% | -27.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.15% | -33.06% | -53.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.69% | — | — |
Volatility
MZZ vs. PLUL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MZZ | PLUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.56% | 177.53% | -145.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 177.53% | -138.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.24% | 177.53% | -136.29% |
MZZ vs. PLUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MZZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PLUL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MZZ vs. PLUL - Dividend Comparison
MZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, while PLUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 | 5.66% | 5.27% | 6.36% | 4.52% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 1.53% | 0.53% |
PLUL Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MZZ and PLUL have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLUL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLUL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MZZ.
MZZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.00% for PLUL.
MZZ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (-200%), while PLUL tracks Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MZZ and 0.75% for PLUL.
Find the right allocation for MZZ and PLUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer