PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MZZ vs. ERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MZZ vs. ERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZZ achieves a -22.57% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 62.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MZZ has underperformed ERX with an annualized return of -25.27%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively higher -9.03% annualized return.


MZZ

1D
-1.64%
1M
-5.89%
YTD
-22.57%
6M
-23.66%
1Y
-35.66%
3Y*
-23.59%
5Y*
-16.74%
10Y*
-25.27%

ERX

1D
2.25%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
62.58%
6M
61.46%
1Y
90.02%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
28.38%
10Y*
-9.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MZZ vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
-22.57%-14.68%-17.75%-23.67%13.02%-42.14%-53.08%-38.03%22.83%-27.72%
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
62.58%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%111.91%-91.60%17.13%-55.94%-11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MZZ and ERX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

-0.64

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MZZ and ERX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.64 to -0.08, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MZZ vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MZZ
MZZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MZZ vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MZZERXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.15

2.20

-3.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.65

2.61

-4.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.32

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

4.08

-5.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.73

11.16

-12.89

MZZ vs. ERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MZZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the ERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MZZ and ERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MZZERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.15

2.20

-3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

0.55

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.61

-0.13

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.60

-0.09

-0.51

Drawdowns

MZZ vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZZ drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, roughly equal to the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZZ and ERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MZZERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.90%

-99.54%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.22%

-23.34%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.13%

-42.34%

-19.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.64%

-46.90%

-21.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.10%

-98.59%

+3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.90%

-91.79%

-8.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.07%

-67.01%

-19.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.39%

8.52%

+11.87%

Volatility

MZZ vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) is 8.88%, while Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a volatility of 16.37%. This indicates that MZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MZZERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

16.37%

-7.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.99%

33.42%

-10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.15%

41.14%

-9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.16%

51.97%

-12.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.39%

69.19%

-27.80%

MZZ vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

MZZ vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison

MZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than ERX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.65%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
6.70%5.27%6.36%4.52%0.25%0.00%0.22%1.53%0.53%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MZZ and ERX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERX has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to MZZ (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MZZ dropped -99.90% vs ERX's -99.54%.

On 10-year performance, ERX leads with -9.03% vs -25.27% for MZZ. On fees, MZZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MZZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ERX has performed better with a -9.03% return vs -25.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MZZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.

MZZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 1.65% for ERX.

MZZ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (-200%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MZZ and 1.09% for ERX.

ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MZZ and ERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer