PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MZLSX vs. NEFZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MZLSX vs. NEFZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) and Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZLSX achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than NEFZX's -0.21% return.


MZLSX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.70%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*

NEFZX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MZLSX vs. NEFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MZLSX
Muzinich Low Duration Fund
1.21%6.38%6.30%7.63%-3.41%2.50%2.64%7.86%0.80%4.26%
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
-0.21%8.92%7.05%8.02%-12.82%3.85%1.15%10.84%-3.00%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MZLSX and NEFZX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2016

0.48

The correlation between MZLSX and NEFZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MZLSX vs. NEFZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MZLSX
MZLSX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MZLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MZLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MZLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MZLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MZLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NEFZX
NEFZX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
NEFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MZLSX vs. NEFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) and Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MZLSXNEFZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.25

1.50

+1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.27

2.17

+3.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.29

+0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

1.58

+1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.35

5.43

+9.91

MZLSX vs. NEFZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MZLSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the NEFZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MZLSX and NEFZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MZLSXNEFZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

1.50

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.30

0.41

+1.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

1.12

+0.63

Drawdowns

MZLSX vs. NEFZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZLSX drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, smaller than the maximum NEFZX drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZLSX and NEFZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MZLSXNEFZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-32.07%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.50%

-4.17%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.50%

-5.88%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.09%

-17.19%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.94%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-3.36%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

1.21%

-0.88%

Volatility

MZLSX vs. NEFZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) is 0.58%, while Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that MZLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MZLSXNEFZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

1.69%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

3.42%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55%

4.41%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.62%

5.57%

-3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.13%

5.27%

-3.14%

MZLSX vs. NEFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZLSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NEFZX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MZLSX vs. NEFZX - Dividend Comparison

MZLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than NEFZX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MZLSX
Muzinich Low Duration Fund
7.24%7.03%4.77%4.88%3.85%6.36%2.08%2.24%8.62%1.86%0.79%0.00%
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
3.96%3.83%5.60%5.37%6.34%2.64%4.20%3.51%4.28%4.06%4.76%10.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


MZLSX and NEFZX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFZX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to MZLSX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MZLSX dropped -12.66% vs NEFZX's -32.07%.

MZLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MZLSX and NEFZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer