MYTHY vs. AMAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MYTHY (Mytilineos Holdings SA ADR) and AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) are both stocks. MYTHY operates in Conglomerates (Industrials), while AMAT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology).

Performance

MYTHY vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mytilineos Holdings SA ADR (MYTHY) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MYTHY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMAT

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 28.11%
• YTD: 95.35%
• 6M: 86.88%
• 1Y: 211.89%
• 3Y*: 56.21%
• 5Y*: 30.15%
• 10Y*: 36.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYTHY vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MYTHY Mytilineos Holdings SA ADR	0.00%
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	55.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MYTHY : $8.32B AMAT : $400.12B
EPS MYTHY : $2.95 AMAT : $10.61
PE Ratio MYTHY : 19.80 AMAT : 47.19
PS Ratio MYTHY : 1.60 AMAT : 13.83
Total Revenue (TTM) MYTHY : $5.21B AMAT : $29.02B
Gross Profit (TTM) MYTHY : $667.88M AMAT : $14.21B
EBITDA (TTM) MYTHY : $692.66M AMAT : $9.92B

Return for Risk

MYTHY vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAT

AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYTHY vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mytilineos Holdings SA ADR (MYTHY) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MYTHY	AMAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.43	—

Drawdowns

MYTHY vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYTHY drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYTHY and AMAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYTHY	AMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-85.22%	+85.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.37%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-49.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-38.81%	+38.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MYTHY	AMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	35.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	46.10%	-46.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	43.57%	-43.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	42.61%	-42.61%

Dividends

MYTHY vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

MYTHY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	0.38%	0.69%	0.93%	0.75%	1.05%	0.60%	1.01%	1.36%	2.14%	0.78%	1.24%	2.14%
MYTHY Mytilineos Holdings SA ADR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

MYTHY vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mytilineos Holdings SA ADR and Applied Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MYTHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mytilineos Holdings SA ADR reported a gross profit of 180.41M and revenue of 1.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.0%.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.

MYTHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mytilineos Holdings SA ADR reported an operating income of 142.56M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.

MYTHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mytilineos Holdings SA ADR reported a net income of 126.88M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.