MYRG vs. STRL
MYRG (MYR Group Inc.) and STRL (Sterling Construction Company, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MYRG returned 33.71%/yr vs 68.46%/yr for STRL. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MYRG vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYRG achieves a 101.99% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 212.52% return. Over the past 10 years, MYRG has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 33.71%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 68.46% annualized return.
MYRG
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 101.99%
- 6M
- 100.81%
- 1Y
- 172.34%
- 3Y*
- 48.68%
- 5Y*
- 37.84%
- 10Y*
- 33.71%
STRL
- 1D
- 9.31%
- 1M
- 80.75%
- YTD
- 212.52%
- 6M
- 195.87%
- 1Y
- 392.73%
- 3Y*
- 168.94%
- 5Y*
- 107.15%
- 10Y*
- 68.46%
MYRG vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYRG MYR Group Inc. | 101.99% | 46.87% | 2.86% | 57.09% | -16.72% | 83.94% | 84.41% | 15.69% | -21.16% | -5.18% |
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 212.52% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYRG and STRL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2008 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, MYRG and STRL have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
MYRG:
$6.92B
STRL:
$29.70B
MYRG:
$9.07
STRL:
$11.19
MYRG:
48.65
STRL:
85.53
MYRG:
0.77
STRL:
1.82
MYRG:
1.80
STRL:
10.28
MYRG:
9.84
STRL:
24.97
MYRG:
$3.82B
STRL:
$2.88B
MYRG:
$461.34M
STRL:
$664.66M
MYRG:
$248.38M
STRL:
$429.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYRG vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
MYRG
STRL
MYRG vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MYRG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.62 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.71 | 12.76 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.10 | 35.75 | -0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MYRG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87 | 4.92 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.90 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 1.29 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.27 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
MYRG vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYRG drawdown since its inception was -64.46%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYRG and STRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYRG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.46% | -92.51% | +28.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.65% | -31.02% | +17.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.29% | -47.67% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.29% | -47.67% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.52% | -59.60% | -1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.85% | 0.00% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -46.32% | +28.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 11.05% | -6.12% |
Volatility
MYRG vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) is 12.98%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 47.76%. This indicates that MYRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYRG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.98% | 47.76% | -34.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.08% | 62.53% | -27.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.81% | 80.55% | -35.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.57% | 56.74% | -15.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.64% | 53.30% | -9.66% |
Dividends
MYRG vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
Neither MYRG nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MYRG vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MYR Group Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MYRG vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison
MYRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MYR Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 134.44M and revenue of 1.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.4%.
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
MYRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MYR Group Inc. reported an operating income of 64.72M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
MYRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MYR Group Inc. reported a net income of 46.80M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MYRG and STRL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (47.76%) compared to MYRG (12.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYRG dropped -64.46% vs STRL's -92.51%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 3.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MYRG and STRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer