PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYN vs. MPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYN vs. MPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYN achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than MPA's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, MYN has underperformed MPA with an annualized return of 0.89%, while MPA has yielded a comparatively higher 1.03% annualized return.


MYN

1D
-0.51%
1M
-4.33%
6M
-0.96%
YTD
1.45%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
-2.92%
10Y*
0.89%
ALL TIME*
2.98%

MPA

1D
-0.64%
1M
-3.90%
6M
-2.20%
YTD
1.31%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-2.75%
10Y*
1.03%
ALL TIME*
4.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$344.29K$260.49K$329.66K
$2.04M$1.54M$1.33M

MYN vs. MPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MYN
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
1.45%4.67%2.87%9.80%-27.05%10.83%6.00%18.31%-7.05%6.96%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
1.31%1.82%6.23%9.67%-31.00%17.06%9.14%18.87%-8.00%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MYN and MPA is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.32

Over the past year, MYN and MPA have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYN vs. MPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MYN
MYN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MPA
MPA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPA Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MYN vs. MPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYNMPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.18

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.29

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.23

4.85

+2.37

MYN vs. MPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYN Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the MPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYN and MPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYN vs. MPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYN drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, roughly equal to the maximum MPA drawdown of -44.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYN and MPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYNMPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-44.78%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-6.42%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-14.75%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.89%

-38.10%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

-38.10%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.13%

-19.37%

+5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-9.80%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.71%

-0.02%

Volatility

MYN vs. MPA - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) at 1.95%. This indicates that MYN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYNMPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

1.95%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

6.09%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

8.21%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

12.07%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

12.30%

-0.90%

MYN vs. MPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYN has a 2.24% expense ratio, which is lower than MPA's 2.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYN vs. MPA - Dividend Comparison

MYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than MPA's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
5.92%6.98%6.02%3.63%5.60%3.94%4.12%4.16%5.40%5.22%5.56%5.94%
MYN
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
6.33%6.20%5.47%3.88%5.37%4.39%4.16%3.90%4.32%4.98%5.44%5.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYN and MPA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MYN has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to MPA (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYN dropped -42.89% vs MPA's -44.78%.

MYN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYN and MPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer