MYN vs. PZT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MYN (BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund) and PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MYN is actively managed, while PZT is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MYN returned 1.19%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for PZT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYN charges 2.24%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for PZT.

Performance

MYN vs. PZT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYN achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly higher than PZT's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MYN has underperformed PZT with an annualized return of 1.19%, while PZT has yielded a comparatively higher 1.90% annualized return.

MYN

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 11.46%
• 3Y*: 6.32%
• 5Y*: -1.62%
• 10Y*: 1.19%

PZT

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 3.17%
• 1Y: 9.52%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: -0.03%
• 10Y*: 1.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYN vs. PZT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MYN BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	3.53%	4.67%	2.87%	9.80%	-27.05%	10.83%	6.00%	18.31%	-7.05%	6.96%
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF	2.87%	1.76%	1.17%	7.57%	-13.04%	2.67%	5.89%	9.52%	-0.55%	6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MYN and PZT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007	0.28

The correlation between MYN and PZT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MYN vs. PZT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYN

MYN Risk / Return Rank: 23
MYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
MYN Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
MYN Martin Ratio Rank: 26

PZT

PZT Risk / Return Rank: 61
PZT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PZT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PZT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PZT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PZT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYN vs. PZT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MYN	PZT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	2.02	-0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.82	-0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.40	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	3.02	-1.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.26	10.29	-4.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MYN vs. PZT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYN Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the PZT Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYN and PZT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MYN	PZT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	2.02	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	-0.00	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	0.27	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.37	-0.13

Drawdowns

MYN vs. PZT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYN drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than PZT's maximum drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYN and PZT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYN	PZT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.89%	-22.73%	-20.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.40%	-3.17%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.65%	-9.00%	-7.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.99%	-19.13%	-16.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.99%	-19.13%	-16.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.37%	-1.42%	-10.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.50%	-3.91%	-6.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	0.93%	+0.91%

Volatility

MYN vs. PZT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) at 2.10%. This indicates that MYN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYN	PZT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	2.10%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.80%	3.45%	+3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.82%	4.75%	+4.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.15%	6.62%	+4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.40%	6.96%	+4.44%

MYN vs. PZT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYN has a 2.24% expense ratio, which is higher than PZT's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

MYN vs. PZT - Dividend Comparison

MYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, more than PZT's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MYN BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	6.14%	6.20%	5.47%	3.88%	5.37%	4.39%	4.16%	3.90%	4.32%	4.98%	5.44%	5.62%
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF	3.58%	3.43%	3.04%	2.82%	2.66%	2.77%	2.55%	2.73%	3.01%	2.94%	3.36%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYN and PZT in my portfolio?

MYN and PZT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MYN or PZT?

MYN has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PZT (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYN dropped -42.89% vs PZT's -22.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PZT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.