MYMK vs. PZT
MYMK (SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF) and PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MYMK is actively managed, while PZT is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYMK charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for PZT.
Performance
MYMK vs. PZT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYMK achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than PZT's 3.37% return.
MYMK
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZT
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 3.37%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
MYMK vs. PZT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MYMK SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.99% | 0.65% |
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.37% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYMK and PZT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYMK vs. PZT — Risk / Return Rank
MYMK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PZT
MYMK vs. PZT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMK) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MYMK | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MYMK vs. PZT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYMK drawdown since its inception was -2.22%, smaller than the maximum PZT drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMK and PZT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYMK | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -22.73% | +20.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.94% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -3.90% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.93% | — |
Volatility
MYMK vs. PZT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYMK | PZT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 4.70% | -2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 6.64% | -4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 6.93% | -5.02% |
MYMK vs. PZT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYMK has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PZT's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
MYMK vs. PZT - Dividend Comparison
MYMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than PZT's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYMK SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.83% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.60% | 3.43% | 3.04% | 2.82% | 2.66% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.73% | 3.01% | 2.94% | 3.36% | 3.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYMK and PZT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MYMK is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MYMK is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.
PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.83% for MYMK.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMK and 0.28% for PZT.
Find the right allocation for MYMK and PZT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer