MYMH vs. KCOP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MYMH (State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF) and KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYMH is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while KCOP is a Copper fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYMH charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for KCOP.

Performance

MYMH vs. KCOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) and Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MYMH

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 3.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KCOP

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYMH vs. KCOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MYMH State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF	-0.08%
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF	1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MYMH and KCOP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026	0.38

Return for Risk

MYMH vs. KCOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYMH

MYMH Risk / Return Rank: 84
MYMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MYMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MYMH Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MYMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MYMH Martin Ratio Rank: 62

KCOP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYMH vs. KCOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) and Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MYMH	KCOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.46	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.87	—	—

Drawdowns

MYMH vs. KCOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYMH drawdown since its inception was -2.67%, smaller than the maximum KCOP drawdown of -21.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMH and KCOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYMH	KCOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-21.55%	+18.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-7.45%	+7.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	-8.38%	+7.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MYMH	KCOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27%	43.46%	-42.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.59%	43.46%	-40.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.59%	43.46%	-40.87%

MYMH vs. KCOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYMH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KCOP's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MYMH vs. KCOP - Dividend Comparison

MYMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than KCOP's 4.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF	4.99%	0.00%	0.00%
MYMH State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF	2.91%	3.01%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYMH and KCOP in my portfolio?

MYMH and KCOP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MYMH or KCOP?

On fees, MYMH is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MYMH or KCOP?

MYMH is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MYMH or KCOP?

KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 2.91% for MYMH.

What is the main difference between MYMH and KCOP?

MYMH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while KCOP is Copper. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMH and 0.99% for KCOP.