MYMG vs. BIL
MYMG (State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYMG is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. MYMG is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. Over the past year, MYMG returned 3.89% vs 3.87% for BIL. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
MYMG vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYMG achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.49% return.
MYMG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
MYMG vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MYMG State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.20% | 2.64% | -0.18% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.49% | 4.15% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYMG and BIL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYMG vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
MYMG
BIL
MYMG vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMG) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MYMG | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -166.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.38 | 87.91 | -85.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.94 | 355.35 | -344.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.03 | 2,817.77 | -2,781.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MYMG | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.80 | 19.71 | -14.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 13.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 2.78 | -1.70 |
Drawdowns
MYMG vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYMG drawdown since its inception was -2.31%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMG and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYMG | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -0.78% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.36% | -0.01% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -0.26% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | 0.00% | +0.11% |
Volatility
MYMG vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMG) has a higher volatility of 0.18% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that MYMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYMG | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 0.05% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.56% | 0.13% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81% | 0.20% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 0.26% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 0.26% | +1.77% |
MYMG vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MYMG vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
MYMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
MYMG State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.88% | 3.03% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYMG and BIL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MYMG has higher volatility (0.18%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYMG dropped -2.31% vs BIL's -0.78%.
On 1-year performance, MYMG leads with 3.89% vs 3.87% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MYMG has performed better with a 3.89% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MYMG.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.88% for MYMG.
MYMG is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BIL is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMG and 0.14% for BIL.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 4.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MYMG and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer