PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYMF vs. GUMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYMF vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYMF achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than GUMI's 1.06% return.


MYMF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.81%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GUMI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.20%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYMF vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYMF
State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF
0.58%3.01%0.19%
GUMI
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF
1.06%3.39%0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MYMF and GUMI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYMF vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYMF
MYMF Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MYMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MYMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GUMI
GUMI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYMF vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYMFGUMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.21

1.64

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.79

8.93

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.74

37.83

-9.08

MYMF vs. GUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYMF Sharpe Ratio is 3.98, which is higher than the GUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYMF and GUMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYMFGUMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98

2.92

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

3.29

-1.93

Drawdowns

MYMF vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYMF drawdown since its inception was -2.02%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMF and GUMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYMFGUMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-0.48%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.38%

-0.36%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.04%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-0.05%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

0.08%

+0.02%

Volatility

MYMF vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) is 0.21%, while Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) has a volatility of 0.25%. This indicates that MYMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYMFGUMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

0.25%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

0.55%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

1.09%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.65%

0.99%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.65%

0.99%

+0.66%

MYMF vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYMF vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison

MYMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than GUMI's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GUMI
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF
2.77%2.95%1.37%
MYMF
State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF
2.47%2.80%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYMF and GUMI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUMI has higher volatility (0.25%) compared to MYMF (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYMF dropped -2.02% vs GUMI's -0.48%.

On 1-year performance, GUMI leads with 3.18% vs 2.95% for MYMF. On fees, GUMI is cheaper at 0.16% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GUMI has performed better with a 3.18% return vs 2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GUMI is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MYMF.

GUMI has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.47% for MYMF.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMF and 0.16% for GUMI.

MYMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYMF and GUMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer