PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYMF vs. AUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYMF vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYMF achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than AUSM's 0.98% return.


MYMF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.81%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUSM

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYMF vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MYMF and AUSM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYMF vs. AUSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYMF
MYMF Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MYMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MYMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AUSM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYMF vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYMFAUSMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.74

MYMF vs. AUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYMFAUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

3.98

-2.61

Drawdowns

MYMF vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYMF drawdown since its inception was -2.02%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMF and AUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYMFAUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-0.42%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.02%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-0.09%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

Volatility

MYMF vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYMFAUSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

0.73%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.65%

0.73%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.65%

0.73%

+0.92%

MYMF vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYMF vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison

MYMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than AUSM's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AUSM
Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF
2.39%1.26%0.00%
MYMF
State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF
2.47%2.80%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYMF and AUSM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MYMF.

MYMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 2.39% for AUSM.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMF and 0.18% for AUSM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYMF and AUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer