MYLD vs. SMCF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MYLD (Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF) and SMCF (Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. MYLD is actively managed, while SMCF is passively managed. Over the past year, MYLD returned 38.77% vs 35.72% for SMCF. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SMCF.

Performance

MYLD vs. SMCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with MYLD at 15.16% and SMCF at 15.16%.

MYLD

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 16.13%
• 1Y: 38.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMCF

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 14.89%
• 1Y: 35.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYLD vs. SMCF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MYLD Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF	15.16%	10.48%	6.95%
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF	15.16%	9.56%	18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MYLD and SMCF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024	0.86

The correlation between MYLD and SMCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MYLD vs. SMCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYLD

MYLD Risk / Return Rank: 68
MYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
MYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
MYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
MYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SMCF

SMCF Risk / Return Rank: 74
SMCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SMCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SMCF Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SMCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SMCF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYLD vs. SMCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MYLD	SMCF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.23	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	3.18	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.40	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.93	5.03	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.41	13.54	-2.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MYLD vs. SMCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SMCF Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYLD and SMCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MYLD	SMCF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	2.23	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.94	-0.25

Drawdowns

MYLD vs. SMCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYLD drawdown since its inception was -28.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SMCF drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYLD and SMCF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYLD	SMCF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.23%	-28.48%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-7.13%	-2.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.23%	+1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-5.28%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	2.65%	+0.76%

Volatility

MYLD vs. SMCF - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) at 3.49%. This indicates that MYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYLD	SMCF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	3.49%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.02%	10.06%	+1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.20%	16.13%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	20.31%	-0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	20.31%	-0.35%

MYLD vs. SMCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SMCF's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MYLD vs. SMCF - Dividend Comparison

MYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than SMCF's 3.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MYLD Cambria Micro And Smallcap Shareholder Yield ETF	2.07%	6.22%	3.26%
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF	3.40%	3.91%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYLD and SMCF in my portfolio?

MYLD and SMCF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MYLD or SMCF?

MYLD has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to SMCF (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYLD dropped -28.23% vs SMCF's -28.48%.

Which ETF is better, MYLD or SMCF?

On 1-year performance, MYLD leads with 38.77% vs 35.72% for SMCF. On fees, SMCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SMCF has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MYLD or SMCF?

Over the 1-year period, MYLD has performed better with a 38.77% return vs 35.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MYLD or SMCF?

SMCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MYLD or SMCF?

SMCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.07% for MYLD.

What is the main difference between MYLD and SMCF?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MYLD and 0.29% for SMCF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.