MYISX vs. NCBVX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MYISX (Victory Integrity Small/Mid-Cap Value Fund) and NCBVX (PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MYISX returned 11.03%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for NCBVX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MYISX charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for NCBVX.

Performance

MYISX vs. NCBVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Integrity Small/Mid-Cap Value Fund (MYISX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYISX achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly lower than NCBVX's 16.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MYISX has outperformed NCBVX with an annualized return of 11.03%, while NCBVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.69% annualized return.

MYISX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 14.79%
• 6M: 15.04%
• 1Y: 32.85%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

NCBVX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 16.47%
• 6M: 16.63%
• 1Y: 31.93%
• 3Y*: 18.04%
• 5Y*: 7.71%
• 10Y*: 7.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYISX vs. NCBVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MYISX Victory Integrity Small/Mid-Cap Value Fund	14.79%	9.47%	9.54%	14.54%	-7.99%	33.19%	4.93%	25.44%	-17.64%	18.39%
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	16.47%	11.86%	10.49%	10.40%	-10.18%	33.13%	-7.31%	18.78%	-20.51%	11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MYISX and NCBVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2011	0.95

The correlation between MYISX and NCBVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MYISX vs. NCBVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYISX

MYISX Risk / Return Rank: 58
MYISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MYISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
MYISX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MYISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
MYISX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

NCBVX

NCBVX Risk / Return Rank: 80
NCBVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NCBVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NCBVX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
NCBVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
NCBVX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYISX vs. NCBVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Integrity Small/Mid-Cap Value Fund (MYISX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MYISX	NCBVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.46	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.50	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.43	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	5.06	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.27	18.35	-7.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MYISX vs. NCBVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the NCBVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYISX and NCBVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MYISX	NCBVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	2.46	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.41	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.34	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.41	+0.04

Drawdowns

MYISX vs. NCBVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYISX drawdown since its inception was -47.79%, smaller than the maximum NCBVX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYISX and NCBVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYISX	NCBVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.79%	-60.64%	+12.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-6.31%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.51%	-21.27%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.51%	-23.15%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.79%	-57.50%	+9.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.77%	-9.10%	+2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	1.74%	+1.17%

Volatility

MYISX vs. NCBVX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Integrity Small/Mid-Cap Value Fund (MYISX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) at 3.20%. This indicates that MYISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NCBVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYISX	NCBVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.32%	3.20%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	9.39%	+1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.91%	13.00%	+2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.16%	18.81%	+2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.27%	22.66%	+0.61%

MYISX vs. NCBVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYISX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NCBVX's 1.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MYISX vs. NCBVX - Dividend Comparison

MYISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than NCBVX's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MYISX Victory Integrity Small/Mid-Cap Value Fund	3.78%	4.34%	10.86%	2.35%	10.17%	6.45%	1.60%	0.75%	4.74%	1.52%	0.10%	0.41%
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	0.59%	0.68%	1.03%	1.59%	1.17%	0.74%	1.60%	1.93%	13.70%	6.69%	2.83%	7.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYISX and NCBVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, MYISX and NCBVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MYISX or NCBVX?

MYISX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to NCBVX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYISX dropped -47.79% vs NCBVX's -60.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCBVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.