MYHC vs. HYLB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MYHC (State Street My2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - MYHC tracks the ICE 2029 Maturity US High Yield Index while HYLB tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MYHC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.

Performance

MYHC vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (MYHC) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MYHC

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYLB

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 8.79%
• 5Y*: 4.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYHC vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MYHC State Street My2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.93%
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MYHC and HYLB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2026	0.97

Return for Risk

MYHC vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLB

HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 62
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYHC vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (MYHC) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MYHC	HYLB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.58	0.58	+0.99

Drawdowns

MYHC vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYHC drawdown since its inception was -1.57%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYHC and HYLB.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYHC	HYLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-22.91%	+21.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.27%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.09%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-2.43%	+2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MYHC	HYLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.68%	3.70%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.68%	7.47%	-2.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	8.18%	-3.50%

MYHC vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYHC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MYHC vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison

MYHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than HYLB's 6.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.48%	6.29%	6.31%	5.84%	5.53%	4.45%	5.22%	5.71%	5.95%	5.85%	0.27%
MYHC State Street My2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYHC and HYLB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, MYHC and HYLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MYHC or HYLB?

On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MYHC or HYLB?

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MYHC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MYHC or HYLB?

HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 1.86% for MYHC.

What is the main difference between MYHC and HYLB?

MYHC tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US High Yield Index, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MYHC and 0.15% for HYLB.