MYCO vs. LQDH
MYCO (SPDR SSGA My2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYCO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
MYCO vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYCO achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 1.99% return.
MYCO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.18%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
MYCO vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MYCO SPDR SSGA My2035 Corporate Bond ETF | -0.16% | 0.67% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 1.99% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYCO and LQDH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYCO vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
MYCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQDH
MYCO vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA My2035 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCO) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MYCO | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MYCO vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYCO drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCO and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYCO | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -24.63% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -0.56% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -1.66% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility
MYCO vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYCO | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.68% | 2.63% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 4.40% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 6.42% | -1.74% |
MYCO vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYCO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MYCO vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
MYCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than LQDH's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.93% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
MYCO SPDR SSGA My2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 3.82% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYCO and LQDH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MYCO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MYCO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 3.82% for MYCO.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCO and 0.25% for LQDH.
Find the right allocation for MYCO and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer