MYCN vs. BNO

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

MYCN (State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - MYCN is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. MYCN is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, MYCN returned 5.01% vs 36.19% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. MYCN charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.

Performance

MYCN vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCN achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 48.83% return.

MYCN

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: -0.02%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 1Y: 5.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -11.86%
• 6M: 43.76%
• YTD: 48.83%
• 1Y: 36.19%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 16.70%
• 10Y*: 11.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCN vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MYCN State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF	0.20%	9.13%	-3.37%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	48.83%	-5.44%	3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCN and BNO is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	-0.27

The correlation between MYCN and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.40 (1 year) to -0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MYCN vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCN

MYCN Risk / Return Rank: 36
MYCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MYCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MYCN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MYCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MYCN Martin Ratio Rank: 39

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 31
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCN vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MYCN	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	0.95	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.50	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.19	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	1.15	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.83	3.44	+1.40

MYCN vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCN Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCN and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MYCN vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCN drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCN and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYCN	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.01%	-87.06%	+82.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.03%	-34.46%	+31.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-29.90%	+28.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-40.07%	+38.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	11.55%	-10.59%

Volatility

MYCN vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) is 1.24%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 13.12%. This indicates that MYCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYCN	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	13.12%	-11.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.45%	38.38%	-34.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.41%	41.83%	-37.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.57%	35.87%	-30.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.57%	36.71%	-31.14%

MYCN vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MYCN vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

MYCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MYCN State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF	5.02%	4.92%	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYCN and BNO in my portfolio?

MYCN and BNO have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MYCN or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to MYCN (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCN dropped -5.01% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, MYCN or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 36.19% vs 5.01% for MYCN. On fees, MYCN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCN has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MYCN or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 36.19% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MYCN or BNO?

MYCN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MYCN or BNO?

MYCN has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between MYCN and BNO?

MYCN is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: State Street and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCN and 1.00% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MYCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.