PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCN vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCN vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCN achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 83.37% return.


MYCN

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
0.13%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
-10.42%
1M
6.90%
YTD
83.37%
6M
83.46%
1Y
199.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCN vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYCN
State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF
-0.02%9.13%-3.40%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
83.37%53.93%-17.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCN and AMDY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCN vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCN
MYCN Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MYCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCN Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCN vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYCNAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.55

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

7.29

-5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.66

16.38

-9.72

MYCN vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCN Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCN and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYCNAMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

3.69

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.07

-0.50

Drawdowns

MYCN vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCN drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCN and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCNAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-53.92%

+48.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-27.59%

+24.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-12.88%

+11.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-17.99%

+16.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

12.25%

-11.34%

Volatility

MYCN vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) is 1.48%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.04%. This indicates that MYCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCNAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

20.04%

-18.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.35%

41.71%

-38.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.48%

54.60%

-50.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

46.43%

-40.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.64%

46.43%

-40.79%

MYCN vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYCN vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

MYCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than AMDY's 66.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
66.60%80.68%109.98%6.68%
MYCN
State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF
5.02%4.92%1.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCN and AMDY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.04%) compared to MYCN (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCN dropped -5.01% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 199.77% vs 6.06% for MYCN. On fees, MYCN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCN has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 199.77% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 66.60%, compared with 5.02% for MYCN.

MYCN is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: State Street and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCN and 0.99% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCN and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer