PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCM vs. FLRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCM vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCM) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCM achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 1.87% return.


MYCM

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.38%
1Y
6.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLRN

1D
0.03%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.19%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
3.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCM vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MYCM and FLRN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCM vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCM
MYCM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MYCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRN
FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCM vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCM) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYCMFLRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-10.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

3.44

-2.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

21.54

-19.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

130.06

-122.08

MYCM vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 7.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCM and FLRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYCMFLRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

7.18

-5.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.50

+0.22

Drawdowns

MYCM vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCM drawdown since its inception was -4.58%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCM and FLRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCMFLRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-14.64%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-0.23%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

0.00%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-1.83%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.04%

+0.78%

Volatility

MYCM vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCM) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.15%. This indicates that MYCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCMFLRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.15%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

0.52%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

0.68%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.12%

1.69%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

4.20%

+0.92%

MYCM vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MYCM and FLRN have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYCM vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

MYCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than FLRN's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
4.51%4.89%5.67%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%
MYCM
State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF
4.74%4.70%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCM and FLRN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MYCM has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to FLRN (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCM dropped -4.58% vs FLRN's -14.64%.

On 1-year performance, MYCM leads with 6.52% vs 4.88% for FLRN. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, FLRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MYCM has performed better with a 6.52% return vs 4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCM and FLRN have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

MYCM has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 4.51% for FLRN.

FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.18 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCM and FLRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer