MYCK vs. PCL
MYCK (State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF) and PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MYCK returned 2.56% vs 0.35% for PCL. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MYCK charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PCL.
Performance
MYCK vs. PCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYCK achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than PCL's -2.10% return.
MYCK
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.29%
PCL
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- 0.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $441.97K | $406.24K | $173.35K | |
| $982.81K | $474.09K | $648.14K |
MYCK vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MYCK State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.01% | 3.46% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | -2.10% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYCK and PCL is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYCK vs. PCL — Risk / Return Rank
MYCK
PCL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MYCK vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCK) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MYCK | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MYCK vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYCK drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, smaller than the maximum PCL drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCK and PCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYCK | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -5.14% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -5.14% | +2.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -4.98% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -1.83% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility
MYCK vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYCK | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 7.82% | -4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 7.82% | -3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 7.82% | -3.64% |
MYCK vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYCK has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MYCK vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison
MYCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than PCL's 6.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MYCK State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.19% | 4.55% | 1.25% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 6.51% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYCK and PCL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, MYCK leads with 2.56% vs 0.35% for PCL. On fees, MYCK is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MYCK has performed better with a 2.56% return vs 0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYCK is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.
PCL has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 4.19% for MYCK.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCK and 0.25% for PCL.
Find the right allocation for MYCK and PCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer