PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCK vs. CMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCK vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCK) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCK achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 16.78% return.


MYCK

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.14%
6M
0.29%
YTD
0.33%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMDY

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.66%
6M
14.34%
YTD
16.78%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCK vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MYCK and CMDY is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024

-0.11

The correlation between MYCK and CMDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCK vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCK
MYCK Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MYCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCK Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCK Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCK vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCK) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYCKCMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.81

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.46

6.24

-0.78

MYCK vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCK Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCK and CMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYCK vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCK drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCK and CMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCKCMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-31.19%

+27.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-14.23%

+11.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-10.60%

+9.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-13.11%

+12.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

4.11%

-3.35%

Volatility

MYCK vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCK) is 1.03%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that MYCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCKCMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

4.20%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

14.35%

-11.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30%

16.45%

-13.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.22%

15.80%

-11.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.22%

14.65%

-10.43%

MYCK vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCK has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYCK vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

MYCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than CMDY's 11.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
11.04%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%
MYCK
State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF
4.56%4.55%1.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCK and CMDY have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMDY has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to MYCK (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCK dropped -3.69% vs CMDY's -31.19%.

On 1-year performance, CMDY leads with 24.63% vs 4.30% for MYCK. On fees, MYCK is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCK has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CMDY has performed better with a 24.63% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCK is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 11.04%, compared with 4.56% for MYCK.

MYCK is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CMDY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCK and 0.28% for CMDY.

CMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCK and CMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer