PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCI vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCI vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCI achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return.


MYCI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.87%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCI vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYCI
State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF
0.45%7.59%-1.56%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%-2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCI and XLE is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

-0.09

The correlation between MYCI and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCI vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCI
MYCI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MYCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCI vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYCIXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.75

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.23

10.92

+0.30

MYCI vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCI and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYCIXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.21

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.31

+0.93

Drawdowns

MYCI vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCI drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCI and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCIXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-71.26%

+68.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.56%

-12.05%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-6.15%

+5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-17.98%

+17.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

4.14%

-3.72%

Volatility

MYCI vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) is 0.59%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that MYCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCIXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

8.25%

-7.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.50%

16.58%

-15.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

20.53%

-18.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

26.02%

-23.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.02%

29.59%

-26.57%

MYCI vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYCI vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

MYCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MYCI
State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.57%4.56%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCI and XLE have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to MYCI (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCI dropped -2.41% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 1-year performance, XLE leads with 45.00% vs 4.75% for MYCI. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, MYCI has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLE has performed better with a 45.00% return vs 4.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MYCI.

MYCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.

MYCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XLE is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCI and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCI and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer