MYCI vs. TUA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MYCI (State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF) and TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYCI is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while TUA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MYCI returned 3.88% vs -3.65% for TUA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MYCI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for TUA.

Performance

MYCI vs. TUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) and Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCI achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than TUA's -6.58% return.

MYCI

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.19%
• 6M: 0.56%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TUA

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -1.41%
• 6M: -6.05%
• YTD: -6.58%
• 1Y: -3.65%
• 3Y*: -0.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCI vs. TUA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MYCI State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF	0.46%	7.59%	-1.58%
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	-6.58%	7.27%	-7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCI and TUA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.83

The correlation between MYCI and TUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MYCI vs. TUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCI

MYCI Risk / Return Rank: 70
MYCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MYCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
MYCI Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MYCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
MYCI Martin Ratio Rank: 63

TUA

TUA Risk / Return Rank: 5
TUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TUA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
TUA Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCI vs. TUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) and Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MYCI	TUA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	-0.52	+2.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	-0.69	+3.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.92	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	-0.50	+2.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.88	-1.13	+10.00

MYCI vs. TUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the TUA Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCI and TUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MYCI vs. TUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCI drawdown since its inception was -2.43%, smaller than the maximum TUA drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCI and TUA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYCI	TUA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-15.85%	+13.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.56%	-7.37%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-11.19%	+10.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-8.41%	+7.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	3.24%	-2.80%

Volatility

MYCI vs. TUA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) is 0.67%, while Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that MYCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYCI	TUA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	2.56%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.62%	5.43%	-3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13%	7.02%	-4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.99%	10.71%	-7.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.99%	10.71%	-7.72%

MYCI vs. TUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TUA's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MYCI vs. TUA - Dividend Comparison

MYCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than TUA's 3.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MYCI State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF	4.57%	4.56%	1.19%	0.00%	0.00%
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	3.36%	3.84%	5.19%	4.83%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYCI and TUA in my portfolio?

MYCI and TUA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MYCI or TUA?

TUA has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to MYCI (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCI dropped -2.43% vs TUA's -15.85%.

Which ETF is better, MYCI or TUA?

On 1-year performance, MYCI leads with 3.88% vs -3.65% for TUA. On fees, MYCI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCI has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MYCI or TUA?

Over the 1-year period, MYCI has performed better with a 3.88% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MYCI or TUA?

MYCI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for TUA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MYCI or TUA?

MYCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 3.36% for TUA.

What is the main difference between MYCI and TUA?

MYCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while TUA is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCI and 0.16% for TUA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MYCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.