MYCH vs. FLRN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MYCH (State Street My2028 Corporate Bond ETF) and FLRN (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from State Street. MYCH is actively managed, while FLRN is passively managed. Over the past year, MYCH returned 4.12% vs 4.78% for FLRN. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

MYCH vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2028 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCH) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCH achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 2.03% return.

MYCH

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.07%
• 1Y: 4.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLRN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: 4.78%
• 3Y*: 5.58%
• 5Y*: 4.22%
• 10Y*: 3.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCH vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MYCH State Street My2028 Corporate Bond ETF	0.80%	7.08%	-1.00%
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	2.03%	5.01%	1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCH and FLRN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

MYCH vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCH

MYCH Risk / Return Rank: 88
MYCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MYCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MYCH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MYCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MYCH Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FLRN

FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCH vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2028 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCH) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MYCH	FLRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	6.89	-4.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.21	12.52	-8.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	3.24	-1.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	21.09	-17.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.13	124.77	-108.64

MYCH vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCH Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is lower than the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 6.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCH and FLRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MYCH vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCH drawdown since its inception was -1.54%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCH and FLRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYCH	FLRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-14.64%	+13.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.09%	-0.23%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	0.00%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-1.82%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	0.04%	+0.22%

Volatility

MYCH vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

State Street My2028 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCH) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.20%. This indicates that MYCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYCH	FLRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	0.20%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.16%	0.54%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61%	0.70%	+0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.15%	1.69%	+0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.15%	4.21%	-2.06%

MYCH vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MYCH and FLRN have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MYCH vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

MYCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than FLRN's 4.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.50%	4.89%	5.67%	5.68%	1.95%	0.39%	1.22%	2.76%	2.39%	1.64%	1.06%	0.63%
MYCH State Street My2028 Corporate Bond ETF	4.39%	4.52%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYCH and FLRN in my portfolio?

MYCH and FLRN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MYCH or FLRN?

MYCH has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to FLRN (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCH dropped -1.54% vs FLRN's -14.64%.

Which ETF is better, MYCH or FLRN?

On 1-year performance, FLRN leads with 4.78% vs 4.12% for MYCH. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, FLRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MYCH or FLRN?

Over the 1-year period, FLRN has performed better with a 4.78% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MYCH or FLRN?

MYCH and FLRN have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MYCH or FLRN?

FLRN has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 4.39% for MYCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.89 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.