MYCF vs. COMB
MYCF (State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYCF is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while COMB is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. MYCF is actively managed, while COMB is passively managed. Over the past year, MYCF returned 4.32% vs 33.79% for COMB. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MYCF charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
MYCF vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYCF achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 20.94% return.
MYCF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.37%
COMB
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- YTD
- 20.94%
- 1Y
- 33.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.64M | $1.63M | $1.76M | |
| $115.26K | $223.19K | $290.05K |
MYCF vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MYCF State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 2.26% | 5.12% | 0.72% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 20.94% | 15.12% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYCF and COMB is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024 | -0.01 |
The correlation between MYCF and COMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYCF vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
MYCF
COMB
MYCF vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MYCF | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +12.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.40 | 1.34 | +2.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 36.22 | 2.29 | +33.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 168.17 | 7.25 | +160.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MYCF vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYCF drawdown since its inception was -0.60%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCF and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYCF | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -33.50% | +32.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | -14.84% | +14.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -8.78% | +8.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -12.02% | +11.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 4.67% | -4.64% |
Volatility
MYCF vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) is 0.17%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that MYCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYCF | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.17% | 5.39% | -5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.41% | 15.04% | -14.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59% | 17.78% | -17.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.05% | 16.74% | -15.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.05% | 15.18% | -14.13% |
MYCF vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYCF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MYCF vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
MYCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than COMB's 7.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.48% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
MYCF State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.36% | 4.50% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYCF and COMB have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMB has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to MYCF (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCF dropped -0.60% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 1-year performance, COMB leads with 33.79% vs 4.32% for MYCF. On fees, MYCF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCF has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMB has performed better with a 33.79% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYCF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for COMB.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.48%, compared with 4.36% for MYCF.
MYCF is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCF and 0.25% for COMB.
MYCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.42 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MYCF and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer