MXVIX vs. OPGSX
MXVIX (Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund) and OPGSX (Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund) are both mutual funds - MXVIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Great-West, while OPGSX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, MXVIX returned 14.49%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for OPGSX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MXVIX charges 0.51%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for OPGSX.
Performance
MXVIX vs. OPGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXVIX achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly higher than OPGSX's -8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MXVIX has outperformed OPGSX with an annualized return of 14.49%, while OPGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.34% annualized return.
MXVIX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 23.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
OPGSX
- 1D
- 5.36%
- 1M
- -18.70%
- YTD
- -8.04%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- 42.61%
- 3Y*
- 33.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
MXVIX vs. OPGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXVIX Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund | 8.39% | 17.30% | 24.31% | 25.57% | -18.56% | 29.04% | 16.96% | 30.84% | -5.32% | 21.05% |
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | -8.04% | 131.03% | 13.05% | 6.35% | -16.86% | -2.75% | 36.15% | 46.37% | -13.15% | 17.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXVIX and OPGSX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2003 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXVIX vs. OPGSX — Risk / Return Rank
MXVIX
OPGSX
MXVIX vs. OPGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXVIX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.21 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 1.39 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 3.89 | +8.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXVIX vs. OPGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXVIX drawdown since its inception was -58.12%, smaller than the maximum OPGSX drawdown of -80.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXVIX and OPGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXVIX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.12% | -80.04% | +21.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -34.52% | +25.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -34.52% | +15.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.74% | -47.09% | +22.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.82% | -47.09% | +13.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.79% | -31.01% | +28.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -29.29% | +20.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 11.81% | -9.85% |
Volatility
MXVIX vs. OPGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX) is 4.42%, while Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that MXVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXVIX | OPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 15.14% | -10.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 36.82% | -27.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 44.53% | -32.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 33.91% | -16.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 33.04% | -14.80% |
MXVIX vs. OPGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXVIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than OPGSX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXVIX vs. OPGSX - Dividend Comparison
MXVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than OPGSX's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXVIX Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.95% | 5.22% | 1.25% | 4.97% | 8.27% | 5.11% | 10.56% | 2.06% | 0.00% |
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.86% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 3.56% | 1.55% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 2.78% | 7.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXVIX and OPGSX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OPGSX has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to MXVIX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXVIX dropped -58.12% vs OPGSX's -80.04%.
MXVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXVIX and OPGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer