MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L
MXUS.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and XMVU.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MXUS.L returned 13.58%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for XMVU.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXUS.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XMVU.L.
Performance
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXUS.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than XMVU.L's 2.14% return.
MXUS.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.33%
XMVU.L
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 10.31% | 17.34% | 25.57% | 27.84% | -20.03% | 27.90% | 20.98% | 31.00% | -5.44% | 21.42% |
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D | 2.14% | 7.94% | 15.67% | 9.79% | -9.53% | 21.63% | 4.38% | 24.92% | -1.18% | 18.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXUS.L and XMVU.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MXUS.L and XMVU.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Financial Services
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Communication Services
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Healthcare
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Industrials
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Consumer Defensive
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Energy
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Utilities
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Real Estate
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Basic Materials
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXUS.L
XMVU.L
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXUS.L | XMVU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.10 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 0.80 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 2.49 | +11.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXUS.L | XMVU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 0.56 | +1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.63 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.75 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum XMVU.L drawdown of -32.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUS.L and XMVU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXUS.L | XMVU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -32.98% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -5.39% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.78% | -10.00% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -17.74% | -7.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.54% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -3.70% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.74% | +0.24% |
Volatility
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) at 2.22%. This indicates that MXUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXUS.L | XMVU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 2.22% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 5.35% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 7.67% | +3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 11.57% | +4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 13.12% | +3.30% |
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Dividend Comparison
MXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D | 1.18% | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.33% | 1.82% | 1.27% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXUS.L and XMVU.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XMVU.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUS.L and 0.20% for XMVU.L.
Find the right allocation for MXUS.L and XMVU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer