PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXUS.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than XMVU.L's 2.14% return.


MXUS.L

1D
0.02%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.31%
6M
10.99%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.33%

XMVU.L

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.27%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.82%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
10.31%17.34%25.57%27.84%-20.03%27.90%20.98%31.00%-5.44%21.42%
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
2.14%7.94%15.67%9.79%-9.53%21.63%4.38%24.92%-1.18%18.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MXUS.L and XMVU.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between MXUS.L and XMVU.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MXUS.L
XMVU.L

Technology

35.4%
29.6%

Financial Services

11.6%
13.7%

Communication Services

11.3%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
6.4%

Healthcare

8.6%
12.7%

Industrials

8.6%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
10.0%

Energy

3.6%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
7.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.2%

Technology

MXUS.L
35.4%
XMVU.L
29.6%

Financial Services

MXUS.L
11.6%
XMVU.L
13.7%

Communication Services

MXUS.L
11.3%
XMVU.L
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MXUS.L
10.1%
XMVU.L
6.4%

Healthcare

MXUS.L
8.6%
XMVU.L
12.7%

Industrials

MXUS.L
8.6%
XMVU.L
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

MXUS.L
4.8%
XMVU.L
10.0%

Energy

MXUS.L
3.6%
XMVU.L
3.5%

Utilities

MXUS.L
2.3%
XMVU.L
7.6%

Real Estate

MXUS.L
1.9%
XMVU.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

MXUS.L
1.8%
XMVU.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXUS.L
MXUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVU.L
XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXUS.LXMVU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.10

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

0.80

+2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.01

2.49

+11.51

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXUS.L and XMVU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXUS.LXMVU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

0.56

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.63

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.75

+0.20

Drawdowns

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum XMVU.L drawdown of -32.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUS.L and XMVU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXUS.LXMVU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-32.98%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-5.39%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-10.00%

-8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.25%

-17.74%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.54%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-3.70%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.74%

+0.24%

Volatility

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) at 2.22%. This indicates that MXUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXUS.LXMVU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

2.22%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

5.35%

+3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

7.67%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

11.57%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

13.12%

+3.30%

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXUS.L vs. XMVU.L - Dividend Comparison

MXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MXUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
1.18%1.24%1.31%1.33%1.82%1.27%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXUS.L and XMVU.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XMVU.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUS.L and 0.20% for XMVU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXUS.L and XMVU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer