PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXUK.L vs. MMS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (MXUK.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXUK.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


MXUK.L

1D
1.02%
1M
1.74%
YTD
6.84%
6M
8.74%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*

MMS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MXUK.L
Invesco MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
6.84%25.73%-0.56%
MMS.L
Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MXUK.L
MMS.L

Financial Services

22.9%
16.9%

Industrials

21.7%
21.8%

Healthcare

12.7%
7.7%

Technology

10.8%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
1.7%

Utilities

5.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

4.6%
5.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.0%

Energy

3.4%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.9%
12.8%

Financial Services

MXUK.L
22.9%
MMS.L
16.9%

Industrials

MXUK.L
21.7%
MMS.L
21.8%

Healthcare

MXUK.L
12.7%
MMS.L
7.7%

Technology

MXUK.L
10.8%
MMS.L
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MXUK.L
7.1%
MMS.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

MXUK.L
7.1%
MMS.L
1.7%

Utilities

MXUK.L
5.0%
MMS.L
3.4%

Basic Materials

MXUK.L
4.6%
MMS.L
5.9%

Communication Services

MXUK.L
4.0%
MMS.L
3.0%

Energy

MXUK.L
3.4%
MMS.L
5.6%

Real Estate

MXUK.L
0.9%
MMS.L
12.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXUK.L
MXUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MXUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MMS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (MXUK.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXUK.LMMS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXUK.LMMS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXUK.LMMS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

Volatility

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXUK.LMMS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXUK.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXUK.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXUK.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MXUK.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUK.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.

MXUK.L tracks MSCI Europe ex-UK NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MXUK.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXUK.L and MMS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer