PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXRLX vs. MXLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXRLX vs. MXLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXRLX achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than MXLGX's 5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MXRLX has underperformed MXLGX with an annualized return of 9.31%, while MXLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.28% annualized return.


MXRLX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.64%
YTD
9.32%
6M
9.76%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
9.31%

MXLGX

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.97%
YTD
5.47%
6M
4.23%
1Y
17.77%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
16.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXRLX vs. MXLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXRLX
Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund
9.32%16.52%10.39%16.96%-16.86%16.12%13.50%25.56%-12.99%20.69%
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
5.47%13.93%25.30%33.43%-34.08%41.30%40.72%36.20%-0.47%28.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXRLX and MXLGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2009

0.78

The correlation between MXRLX and MXLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXRLX vs. MXLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXRLX
MXRLX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MXRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MXRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MXLGX
MXLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MXLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXRLX vs. MXLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXRLXMXLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.28

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

3.97

+6.47

MXRLX vs. MXLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the MXLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXRLX and MXLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXRLXMXLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.35

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.55

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.70

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.26

+0.13

Drawdowns

MXRLX vs. MXLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXRLX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, smaller than the maximum MXLGX drawdown of -62.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXRLX and MXLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXRLXMXLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.66%

-62.98%

+22.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-14.95%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-20.74%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.66%

-38.07%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.95%

-38.07%

+5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.54%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.60%

-25.81%

+15.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

4.71%

-2.65%

Volatility

MXRLX vs. MXLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) is 3.24%, while Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that MXRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXRLXMXLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

3.50%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

10.56%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

14.15%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

21.83%

-6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

23.45%

-7.29%

MXRLX vs. MXLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXRLX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than MXLGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXRLX vs. MXLGX - Dividend Comparison

MXRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than MXLGX's 12.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
12.23%12.90%9.72%2.95%9.29%21.33%30.57%17.96%25.47%5.25%
MXRLX
Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund
4.22%4.61%6.48%4.42%9.59%10.39%5.64%10.54%11.75%3.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXRLX and MXLGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLGX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to MXRLX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXRLX dropped -40.66% vs MXLGX's -62.98%.

MXRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXRLX and MXLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer