MXMVX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Mid Cap Value Fund (MXMVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
MXMVX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on May 15, 2008. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
MXMVX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXMVX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXMVX Great-West Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.99% | 8.32% | 15.59% | 15.15% | -27.98% | 34.87% | -0.99% | 20.49% | -13.76% | 16.62% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXMVX achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MXMVX has underperformed HWMIX with an annualized return of 7.02%, while HWMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.08% annualized return.
MXMVX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- 1Y
- 14.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.02%
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXMVX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXMVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXMVX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
MXMVX
HWMIX
MXMVX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Mid Cap Value Fund (MXMVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXMVX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.93 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.41 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.35 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 5.49 | -0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXMVX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.93 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.44 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.36 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.47 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXMVX and HWMIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXMVX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
MXMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than HWMIX's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXMVX Great-West Mid Cap Value Fund | 5.81% | 5.98% | 9.03% | 0.49% | 2.55% | 3.29% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 7.06% | 12.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
MXMVX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXMVX drawdown since its inception was -57.13%, smaller than the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXMVX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXMVX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.13% | -69.84% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -16.87% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -25.90% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.46% | -63.21% | +17.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -3.32% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.62% | -10.89% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 4.15% | -0.91% |
Volatility
MXMVX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Mid Cap Value Fund (MXMVX) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 4.30%. This indicates that MXMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXMVX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.30% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 12.42% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 23.86% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 22.34% | -2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 25.62% | -5.06% |