MXLZX vs. FFBQX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MXLZX (Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund) and FFBQX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, MXLZX returned 3.92%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for FFBQX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXLZX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FFBQX.

Performance

MXLZX vs. FFBQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLZX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than FFBQX's 13.33% return.

MXLZX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 4.44%
• 6M: 4.62%
• 1Y: 11.02%
• 3Y*: 8.92%
• 5Y*: 3.92%
• 10Y*: 5.48%

FFBQX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 14.58%
• 1Y: 29.89%
• 3Y*: 21.28%
• 5Y*: 10.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLZX vs. FFBQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MXLZX Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund	4.44%	9.92%	6.22%	10.36%	-12.33%	8.53%	10.83%	4.70%
FFBQX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6	13.33%	22.90%	16.84%	20.67%	-18.86%	16.47%	18.10%	9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLZX and FFBQX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019	0.82

The correlation between MXLZX and FFBQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MXLZX vs. FFBQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLZX

MXLZX Risk / Return Rank: 51
MXLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MXLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MXLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MXLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MXLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FFBQX

FFBQX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FFBQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FFBQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FFBQX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FFBQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FFBQX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLZX vs. FFBQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MXLZX	FFBQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.41	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.34	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.45	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	3.16	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.80	14.04	-3.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXLZX vs. FFBQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FFBQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLZX and FFBQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MXLZX	FFBQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.41	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.71	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.78	-0.29

Drawdowns

MXLZX vs. FFBQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLZX drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum FFBQX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLZX and FFBQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXLZX	FFBQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.60%	-31.34%	+10.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-9.67%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.49%	-15.51%	+9.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.60%	-27.60%	+7.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-0.62%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.76%	-5.96%	+1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	2.17%	-1.12%

Volatility

MXLZX vs. FFBQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) is 1.78%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that MXLZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFBQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXLZX	FFBQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.78%	4.21%	-2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.37%	10.40%	-6.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.72%	12.68%	-6.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.43%	15.10%	-6.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.41%	17.24%	-8.83%

MXLZX vs. FFBQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLZX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FFBQX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXLZX vs. FFBQX - Dividend Comparison

MXLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than FFBQX's 3.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFBQX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6	3.34%	2.58%	5.66%	2.07%	5.40%	6.98%	3.62%	2.96%	0.00%	0.00%
MXLZX Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund	3.29%	3.43%	4.50%	4.14%	7.81%	7.85%	2.96%	6.00%	5.91%	2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXLZX and FFBQX in my portfolio?

MXLZX and FFBQX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MXLZX or FFBQX?

FFBQX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to MXLZX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLZX dropped -20.60% vs FFBQX's -31.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFBQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.