PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLZX vs. FNSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLZX vs. FNSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLZX achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than FNSDX's 14.91% return.


MXLZX

1D
0.49%
1M
0.84%
YTD
4.73%
6M
4.54%
1Y
11.42%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
5.52%

FNSDX

1D
1.46%
1M
3.32%
YTD
14.91%
6M
14.94%
1Y
32.40%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLZX vs. FNSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLZX
Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund
4.73%9.92%6.22%10.36%-12.33%8.53%10.83%15.41%-7.03%4.50%
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
14.91%23.81%14.18%20.65%-18.23%16.65%18.34%25.58%-8.85%7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLZX and FNSDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017

0.80

The correlation between MXLZX and FNSDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLZX vs. FNSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLZX
MXLZX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MXLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSDX
FNSDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FNSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLZX vs. FNSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXLZXFNSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.31

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

14.43

-3.75

MXLZX vs. FNSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the FNSDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLZX and FNSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXLZX vs. FNSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLZX drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum FNSDX drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLZX and FNSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLZXFNSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-30.95%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-9.76%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.49%

-15.44%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.60%

-27.31%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-5.59%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.23%

-1.17%

Volatility

MXLZX vs. FNSDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) is 2.30%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that MXLZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLZXFNSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

5.84%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

11.73%

-6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.00%

13.75%

-7.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

15.20%

-6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

16.03%

-7.60%

MXLZX vs. FNSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLZX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSDX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLZX vs. FNSDX - Dividend Comparison

MXLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than FNSDX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
4.93%3.87%2.13%2.07%11.45%11.27%4.26%6.31%6.79%2.72%
MXLZX
Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund
3.28%3.43%4.50%4.14%7.81%7.85%2.96%6.00%5.91%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLZX and FNSDX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNSDX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to MXLZX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLZX dropped -20.60% vs FNSDX's -30.95%.

FNSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLZX and FNSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer