MXLZX vs. FRBHX
MXLZX (Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund) and FRBHX (Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past year, MXLZX returned 11.02% vs 30.14% for FRBHX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXLZX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FRBHX.
Performance
MXLZX vs. FRBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXLZX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than FRBHX's 13.36% return.
MXLZX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
FRBHX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 15.04%
- 1Y
- 30.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MXLZX vs. FRBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MXLZX Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund | 4.44% | 9.92% | 2.44% |
FRBHX Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 | 13.36% | 23.65% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXLZX and FRBHX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between MXLZX and FRBHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXLZX vs. FRBHX — Risk / Return Rank
MXLZX
FRBHX
MXLZX vs. FRBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXLZX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.45 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 3.17 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.80 | 14.13 | -3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXLZX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.43 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.40 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
MXLZX vs. FRBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXLZX drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, which is greater than FRBHX's maximum drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLZX and FRBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXLZX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -15.29% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -9.77% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.51% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.76% | -1.78% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 2.19% | -1.14% |
Volatility
MXLZX vs. FRBHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) is 1.78%, while Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that MXLZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRBHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXLZX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 4.26% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.37% | 10.51% | -6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.72% | 12.78% | -7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 15.79% | -7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 15.79% | -7.38% |
MXLZX vs. FRBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXLZX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FRBHX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXLZX vs. FRBHX - Dividend Comparison
MXLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than FRBHX's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBHX Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 | 4.22% | 2.53% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MXLZX Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund | 3.29% | 3.43% | 4.50% | 4.14% | 7.81% | 7.85% | 2.96% | 6.00% | 5.91% | 2.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXLZX and FRBHX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRBHX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to MXLZX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLZX dropped -20.60% vs FRBHX's -15.29%.
FRBHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXLZX and FRBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer