PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLSX vs. VSCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLSX vs. VSCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLSX achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly lower than VSCAX's 31.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLSX has underperformed VSCAX with an annualized return of 9.07%, while VSCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.79% annualized return.


MXLSX

1D
0.68%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.97%
6M
14.60%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
9.07%

VSCAX

1D
3.55%
1M
7.75%
YTD
31.33%
6M
33.12%
1Y
62.09%
3Y*
32.70%
5Y*
19.56%
10Y*
17.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLSX vs. VSCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
14.97%4.08%8.20%17.81%-10.07%31.12%2.84%24.67%-16.64%8.44%
VSCAX
Invesco Small Cap Value Fund
31.33%17.70%24.54%22.84%4.31%36.34%10.81%32.02%-25.64%18.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLSX and VSCAX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 1999

0.90

The correlation between MXLSX and VSCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLSX vs. VSCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLSX
MXLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MXLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCAX
VSCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VSCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLSX vs. VSCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXLSXVSCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.52

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

5.76

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

20.42

-10.77

MXLSX vs. VSCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the VSCAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLSX and VSCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXLSXVSCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

3.19

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.85

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.67

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.54

-0.27

Drawdowns

MXLSX vs. VSCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLSX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VSCAX drawdown of -57.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLSX and VSCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLSXVSCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.41%

-57.77%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-11.43%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-25.29%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-25.29%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.52%

-57.77%

+14.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-8.90%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.21%

-0.10%

Volatility

MXLSX vs. VSCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) is 4.26%, while Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that MXLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLSXVSCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

6.31%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

15.82%

-4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

20.63%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

23.17%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

26.73%

-4.43%

MXLSX vs. VSCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLSX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VSCAX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLSX vs. VSCAX - Dividend Comparison

MXLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than VSCAX's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
0.42%0.48%1.07%2.24%2.93%6.23%0.23%0.47%2.92%5.29%0.00%0.00%
VSCAX
Invesco Small Cap Value Fund
7.02%9.22%7.90%4.93%10.12%16.90%0.30%2.53%28.45%16.65%1.71%11.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLSX and VSCAX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSCAX has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to MXLSX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLSX dropped -60.41% vs VSCAX's -57.77%.

VSCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLSX and VSCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer