MXLSX vs. NSDVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX).
MXLSX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Nov 1, 1994. NSDVX is managed by North Star. It was launched on May 31, 2013.
Performance
MXLSX vs. NSDVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXLSX vs. NSDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 4.19% | 4.08% | 8.20% | 17.81% | -10.07% | 31.12% | 2.84% | 24.67% | -16.64% | 8.44% |
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund | 7.73% | -1.31% | 9.25% | 8.06% | -6.36% | 16.16% | 6.51% | 16.13% | -12.35% | 8.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXLSX achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly lower than NSDVX's 7.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLSX has outperformed NSDVX with an annualized return of 8.44%, while NSDVX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.76% annualized return.
MXLSX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 10.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
NSDVX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- 7.73%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- 9.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.12%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXLSX vs. NSDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXLSX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NSDVX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXLSX vs. NSDVX — Risk / Return Rank
MXLSX
NSDVX
MXLSX vs. NSDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXLSX | NSDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.58 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 0.96 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 0.95 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | 2.29 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXLSX | NSDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.58 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.19 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.44 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXLSX and NSDVX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXLSX vs. NSDVX - Dividend Comparison
MXLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than NSDVX's 3.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 0.46% | 0.48% | 1.07% | 2.24% | 2.93% | 6.23% | 0.23% | 0.47% | 2.92% | 5.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund | 3.07% | 3.45% | 7.00% | 2.52% | 6.57% | 3.31% | 1.52% | 2.64% | 6.87% | 2.48% | 4.67% | 3.51% |
Drawdowns
MXLSX vs. NSDVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXLSX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, which is greater than NSDVX's maximum drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLSX and NSDVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXLSX | NSDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.41% | -38.64% | -21.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.02% | -10.48% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -22.58% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.52% | -38.64% | -4.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.74% | -4.78% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -6.62% | -5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 4.33% | -0.12% |
Volatility
MXLSX vs. NSDVX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) at 4.22%. This indicates that MXLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXLSX | NSDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 4.22% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 10.13% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.48% | 17.07% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 16.17% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 17.66% | +4.63% |