PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLSX vs. MXIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLSX vs. MXIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLSX achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly higher than MXIVX's 8.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXLSX having a 9.07% annualized return and MXIVX not far ahead at 9.15%.


MXLSX

1D
0.68%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.97%
6M
14.60%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
9.07%

MXIVX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.43%
YTD
8.25%
6M
11.28%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLSX vs. MXIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
14.97%4.08%8.20%17.81%-10.07%31.12%2.84%24.67%-16.64%8.44%
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
8.25%39.08%5.46%18.05%-15.20%10.38%10.20%22.07%-15.68%25.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLSX and MXIVX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 1994

0.61

The correlation between MXLSX and MXIVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLSX vs. MXIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLSX
MXLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MXLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MXIVX
MXIVX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MXIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLSX vs. MXIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXLSXMXIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.16

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

8.08

+1.56

MXLSX vs. MXIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the MXIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLSX and MXIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXLSXMXIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.81

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.62

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.48

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.17

+0.10

Drawdowns

MXLSX vs. MXIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLSX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, smaller than the maximum MXIVX drawdown of -76.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLSX and MXIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLSXMXIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.41%

-76.77%

+16.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-11.65%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-13.63%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-29.13%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.52%

-33.18%

-10.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.88%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-22.19%

+10.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.05%

+0.06%

Volatility

MXLSX vs. MXIVX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) at 3.91%. This indicates that MXLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLSXMXIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

3.91%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

10.93%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

13.96%

+2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

16.01%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

19.42%

+2.88%

MXLSX vs. MXIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLSX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MXIVX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLSX vs. MXIVX - Dividend Comparison

MXLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than MXIVX's 5.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
5.51%5.96%4.97%3.27%2.99%4.27%1.99%2.42%27.79%2.85%
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
0.42%0.48%1.07%2.24%2.93%6.23%0.23%0.47%2.92%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLSX and MXIVX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLSX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to MXIVX (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLSX dropped -60.41% vs MXIVX's -76.77%.

MXLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLSX and MXIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer