PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLSX vs. DHSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLSX vs. DHSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund Class I (DHSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLSX achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly lower than DHSIX's 25.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLSX has underperformed DHSIX with an annualized return of 9.29%, while DHSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.68% annualized return.


MXLSX

1D
0.50%
1M
1.91%
6M
12.88%
YTD
20.87%
1Y
27.79%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
9.29%

DHSIX

1D
0.35%
1M
3.46%
6M
16.40%
YTD
25.61%
1Y
37.36%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLSX vs. DHSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
20.87%4.08%8.20%17.81%-10.07%31.12%2.84%24.67%-16.64%8.44%
DHSIX
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund Class I
25.61%11.83%13.10%24.25%-14.85%32.69%-0.27%21.83%-15.00%10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLSX and DHSIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2005

0.91

The correlation between MXLSX and DHSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLSX vs. DHSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLSX
MXLSX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MXLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DHSIX
DHSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DHSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DHSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLSX vs. DHSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund Class I (DHSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXLSXDHSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.53

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

11.30

-1.90

MXLSX vs. DHSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the DHSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLSX and DHSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXLSX vs. DHSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLSX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, which is greater than DHSIX's maximum drawdown of -52.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLSX and DHSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLSXDHSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.41%

-52.83%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-10.97%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-28.33%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-28.33%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.52%

-45.96%

+2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-2.97%

+2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.09%

-8.34%

-3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.42%

-0.34%

Volatility

MXLSX vs. DHSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) is 3.15%, while Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund Class I (DHSIX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that MXLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLSXDHSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

5.13%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

13.95%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

19.73%

-3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.72%

21.46%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

22.21%

0.00%

MXLSX vs. DHSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLSX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than DHSIX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLSX vs. DHSIX - Dividend Comparison

MXLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than DHSIX's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHSIX
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund Class I
4.57%5.74%15.81%30.09%18.06%17.39%0.61%7.13%10.46%6.90%2.68%1.95%
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
0.40%0.48%1.07%2.24%2.93%6.23%0.23%0.47%2.92%5.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLSX and DHSIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHSIX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to MXLSX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLSX dropped -60.41% vs DHSIX's -52.83%.

DHSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLSX and DHSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer