PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLGX vs. MXSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLGX vs. MXSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) and Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund (MXSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLGX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than MXSDX's 0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLGX has outperformed MXSDX with an annualized return of 16.28%, while MXSDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


MXLGX

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.97%
YTD
5.47%
6M
4.23%
1Y
17.77%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
16.28%

MXSDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.02%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLGX vs. MXSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
5.47%13.93%25.30%33.43%-34.08%41.30%40.72%36.20%-0.47%28.82%
MXSDX
Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund
0.67%5.30%4.24%5.67%-4.25%-0.03%4.64%5.40%0.73%1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLGX and MXSDX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2003

-0.06

The correlation between MXLGX and MXSDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLGX vs. MXSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLGX
MXLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MXLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

MXSDX
MXSDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MXSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MXSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLGX vs. MXSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) and Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund (MXSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXLGXMXSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.71

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

4.52

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.97

18.63

-14.66

MXLGX vs. MXSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the MXSDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLGX and MXSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXLGXMXSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.87

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.05

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

1.12

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.32

-0.06

Drawdowns

MXLGX vs. MXSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLGX drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than MXSDX's maximum drawdown of -10.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLGX and MXSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLGXMXSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.98%

-10.81%

-52.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.95%

-0.85%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

-1.30%

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.07%

-6.63%

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.07%

-7.78%

-30.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.09%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.81%

-3.03%

-22.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

0.20%

+4.51%

Volatility

MXLGX vs. MXSDX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund (MXSDX) at 0.41%. This indicates that MXLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLGXMXSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

0.41%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

0.89%

+9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

1.34%

+12.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.83%

2.11%

+19.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.45%

2.00%

+21.45%

MXLGX vs. MXSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MXSDX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLGX vs. MXSDX - Dividend Comparison

MXLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.23%, more than MXSDX's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
12.23%12.90%9.72%2.95%9.29%21.33%30.57%17.96%25.47%5.25%
MXSDX
Great-West Short Duration Bond Fund
3.06%3.08%4.43%2.31%1.51%1.87%2.14%2.06%1.90%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLGX and MXSDX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLGX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to MXSDX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLGX dropped -62.98% vs MXSDX's -10.81%.

MXSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLGX and MXSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer