MXLGX vs. GXXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX).
MXLGX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on May 21, 2003. GXXIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000.
Performance
MXLGX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXLGX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLGX Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.64% | 13.93% | 25.30% | 33.43% | -34.08% | 41.30% | 40.72% | 36.20% | -0.47% | 28.82% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | -7.53% | 3.82% | 10.11% | 15.19% | -26.55% | 81.37% | 29.56% | 36.96% | -6.73% | 20.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXLGX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than GXXIX's -7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLGX has outperformed GXXIX with an annualized return of 14.58%, while GXXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.
MXLGX
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -9.01%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
GXXIX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXLGX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXLGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXLGX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank
MXLGX
GXXIX
MXLGX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXLGX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.19 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 0.40 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.05 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.31 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | 1.15 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXLGX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.19 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.34 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.56 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.60 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXLGX and GXXIX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXLGX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison
MXLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.12%, more than GXXIX's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLGX Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund | 14.12% | 12.90% | 9.72% | 2.95% | 9.29% | 21.33% | 30.57% | 17.96% | 25.47% | 5.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | 2.48% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 59.39% | 14.10% | 9.76% | 12.93% | 10.11% | 12.20% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
MXLGX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXLGX drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLGX and GXXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXLGX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.98% | -33.65% | -29.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -11.78% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.07% | -33.65% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | -33.65% | -4.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -10.87% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -6.20% | -19.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 3.14% | +1.75% |
Volatility
MXLGX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 5.20%. This indicates that MXLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXLGX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 5.20% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 9.27% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 16.73% | +4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 27.78% | -5.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 23.72% | -0.30% |