PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALARX vs. MXMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALARX vs. MXMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund (ALARX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALARX achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly higher than MXMDX's 15.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ALARX has outperformed MXMDX with an annualized return of 20.01%, while MXMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.26% annualized return.


ALARX

1D
2.18%
1M
5.37%
YTD
17.11%
6M
15.77%
1Y
44.34%
3Y*
37.10%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*
20.01%

MXMDX

1D
1.13%
1M
3.32%
YTD
15.14%
6M
12.60%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
10.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALARX vs. MXMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALARX
Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund
17.11%31.75%49.44%42.82%-36.88%18.38%41.50%33.13%-0.82%31.11%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
15.14%6.90%13.23%15.75%-13.60%24.25%12.84%25.48%-12.02%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ALARX and MXMDX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2011

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between ALARX and MXMDX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALARX vs. MXMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALARX
ALARX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ALARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALARX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ALARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALARX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MXMDX
MXMDX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MXMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALARX vs. MXMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund (ALARX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALARXMXMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.11

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

11.15

-3.60

ALARX vs. MXMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALARX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the MXMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALARX and MXMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALARX vs. MXMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALARX drawdown since its inception was -68.32%, which is greater than MXMDX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALARX and MXMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALARXMXMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.32%

-41.80%

-26.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.65%

-8.87%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.77%

-24.15%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.86%

-24.15%

-22.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.86%

-41.80%

-5.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.41%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-5.93%

-15.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

2.43%

+3.29%

Volatility

ALARX vs. MXMDX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund (ALARX) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) at 4.88%. This indicates that ALARX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALARXMXMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.20%

4.88%

+4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.85%

11.68%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.68%

15.64%

+7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.06%

20.03%

+8.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

21.25%

+3.67%

ALARX vs. MXMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALARX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than MXMDX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALARX vs. MXMDX - Dividend Comparison

ALARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, more than MXMDX's 5.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALARX
Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund
5.96%6.99%13.06%8.09%3.90%19.40%16.62%10.34%12.39%6.75%0.00%7.71%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
5.78%6.66%3.04%4.76%4.35%5.24%5.74%3.74%8.13%4.51%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALARX and MXMDX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALARX has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to MXMDX (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALARX dropped -68.32% vs MXMDX's -41.80%.

ALARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALARX and MXMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer