PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXL vs. MTSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MXL vs. MTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXL achieves a 387.61% return, which is significantly higher than MTSI's 117.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MXL has underperformed MTSI with an annualized return of 16.73%, while MTSI has yielded a comparatively higher 27.49% annualized return.


MXL

1D
-4.59%
1M
-14.29%
YTD
387.61%
6M
384.55%
1Y
524.93%
3Y*
43.20%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
16.73%

MTSI

1D
0.25%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
117.82%
6M
112.21%
1Y
166.79%
3Y*
84.63%
5Y*
43.20%
10Y*
27.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXL vs. MTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXL
MaxLinear, Inc.
387.61%-11.88%-16.79%-29.99%-54.97%97.41%79.97%20.57%-33.38%21.19%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
117.82%31.85%39.76%47.59%-19.57%42.26%106.92%83.32%-55.41%-29.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MXL and MTSI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2012

0.54

The correlation between MXL and MTSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MXL:

$7.44B

MTSI:

$28.78B

EPS

MXL:

-$1.52

MTSI:

$2.33

PS Ratio

MXL:

14.56

MTSI:

26.38

PB Ratio

MXL:

14.86

MTSI:

20.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

MXL:

$508.90M

MTSI:

$1.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MXL:

$289.93M

MTSI:

$594.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

MXL:

-$70.54M

MTSI:

$245.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXL vs. MTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXL
MXL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MTSI
MTSI Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXL vs. MTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXLMTSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.45

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.86

8.50

+9.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.86

21.62

+27.25

MXL vs. MTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXL Sharpe Ratio is 4.85, which is higher than the MTSI Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXL and MTSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXL vs. MTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXL drawdown since its inception was -88.13%, which is greater than MTSI's maximum drawdown of -80.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXL and MTSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLMTSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.13%

-80.78%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.65%

-19.74%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.61%

-41.09%

-32.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.13%

-44.86%

-43.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.13%

-80.78%

-7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.90%

-8.93%

-7.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.96%

-26.17%

-18.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.82%

7.75%

+3.07%

Volatility

MXL vs. MTSI - Volatility Comparison

MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) has a higher volatility of 30.23% compared to MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) at 21.43%. This indicates that MXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLMTSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.23%

21.43%

+8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

84.46%

40.97%

+43.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.18%

51.70%

+57.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.40%

43.94%

+33.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.01%

52.47%

+13.54%

Dividends

MXL vs. MTSI - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXL nor MTSI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MXL vs. MTSI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MaxLinear, Inc. and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
137.19M
288.96M
(MXL) Total Revenue
(MTSI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MXL vs. MTSI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MaxLinear, Inc. and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%52.0%54.0%56.0%58.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
57.5%
56.9%
Portfolio components
MXL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.88M and revenue of 137.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

MTSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

MXL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported an operating income of -17.21M and revenue of 137.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.5%.

MTSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

MXL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a net income of -45.14M and revenue of 137.19M, resulting in a net margin of -32.9%.

MTSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MXL and MTSI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXL has higher volatility (30.23%) compared to MTSI (21.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXL dropped -88.13% vs MTSI's -80.78%.

MXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 3.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXL and MTSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer