PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIVX vs. MXLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIVX vs. MXLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIVX achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than MXLSX's 13.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXIVX having a 9.05% annualized return and MXLSX not far behind at 8.98%.


MXIVX

1D
-0.87%
1M
1.61%
YTD
7.31%
6M
10.18%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
9.05%

MXLSX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
13.94%
6M
13.57%
1Y
26.13%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXIVX vs. MXLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
7.31%39.08%5.46%18.05%-15.20%10.38%10.20%22.07%-15.68%25.12%
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
13.94%4.08%8.20%17.81%-10.07%31.12%2.84%24.67%-16.64%8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIVX and MXLSX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 1994

0.61

The correlation between MXIVX and MXLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIVX vs. MXLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXIVX
MXIVX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MXIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MXLSX
MXLSX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MXLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXIVX vs. MXLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) and Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXIVXMXLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.72

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

8.54

-0.57

MXIVX vs. MXLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the MXLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIVX and MXLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXIVXMXLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.63

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.33

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.41

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.27

-0.10

Drawdowns

MXIVX vs. MXLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIVX drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, which is greater than MXLSX's maximum drawdown of -60.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIVX and MXLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIVXMXLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.77%

-60.41%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-9.84%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-26.04%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

-26.04%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

-43.52%

+10.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-1.28%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-12.14%

-10.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.12%

-0.06%

Volatility

MXIVX vs. MXLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West International Value Fund (MXIVX) is 3.87%, while Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that MXIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIVXMXLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

4.24%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

11.38%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

16.45%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

20.83%

-4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.42%

22.30%

-2.88%

MXIVX vs. MXLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MXLSX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIVX vs. MXLSX - Dividend Comparison

MXIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than MXLSX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIVX
Great-West International Value Fund
5.56%5.96%4.97%3.27%2.99%4.27%1.99%2.42%27.79%2.85%
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
0.42%0.48%1.07%2.24%2.93%6.23%0.23%0.47%2.92%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIVX and MXLSX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLSX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to MXIVX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIVX dropped -76.77% vs MXLSX's -60.41%.

MXIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIVX and MXLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer