PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXINX vs. DCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXINX vs. DCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Index Fund (MXINX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXINX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than DCINX's 26.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MXINX has underperformed DCINX with an annualized return of 8.58%, while DCINX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


MXINX

1D
0.29%
1M
4.10%
YTD
9.45%
6M
11.85%
1Y
21.92%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
8.58%

DCINX

1D
1.10%
1M
9.28%
YTD
26.35%
6M
30.17%
1Y
54.52%
3Y*
29.16%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXINX vs. DCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXINX
Great-West International Index Fund
9.45%30.90%2.92%17.56%-14.75%10.32%7.97%21.26%-13.93%24.73%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
26.35%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-14.27%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MXINX and DCINX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011

0.89

The correlation between MXINX and DCINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXINX vs. DCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXINX
MXINX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MXINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXINX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MXINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXINX vs. DCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Index Fund (MXINX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXINXDCINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.61

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

4.61

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.19

18.49

-11.30

MXINX vs. DCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the DCINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXINX and DCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXINXDCINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

3.46

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.92

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.78

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.35

-0.03

Drawdowns

MXINX vs. DCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXINX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum DCINX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXINX and DCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXINXDCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-61.79%

+27.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-11.91%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-13.74%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.75%

-31.18%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-37.28%

+2.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

0.00%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-12.85%

+4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.96%

+0.04%

Volatility

MXINX vs. DCINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West International Index Fund (MXINX) is 4.73%, while Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that MXINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXINXDCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

5.53%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.39%

13.47%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

15.89%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

15.40%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

16.53%

+0.49%

MXINX vs. DCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXINX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DCINX's 2.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXINX vs. DCINX - Dividend Comparison

MXINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than DCINX's 8.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
8.66%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%
MXINX
Great-West International Index Fund
3.05%3.34%2.20%4.38%1.80%5.73%2.45%2.64%3.55%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXINX and DCINX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCINX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to MXINX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXINX dropped -34.59% vs DCINX's -61.79%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXINX and DCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer