PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXIGX vs. MXLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXIGX vs. MXLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXIGX achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than MXLGX's 6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MXIGX has underperformed MXLGX with an annualized return of 6.52%, while MXLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.


MXIGX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.50%
YTD
3.50%
6M
3.29%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
6.52%

MXLGX

1D
0.18%
1M
5.24%
YTD
6.05%
6M
4.89%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXIGX vs. MXLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
3.50%11.53%4.04%16.54%-30.35%5.59%28.93%34.07%-16.91%26.64%
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
6.05%13.93%25.30%33.43%-34.08%41.30%40.72%36.20%-0.47%28.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXIGX and MXLGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2003

0.73

The correlation between MXIGX and MXLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXIGX vs. MXLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXIGX
MXIGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MXIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MXIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MXLGX
MXLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MXLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXIGX vs. MXLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXIGXMXLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

1.43

-1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

2.00

-1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.26

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

1.36

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.31

4.21

-2.90

MXIGX vs. MXLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the MXLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXIGX and MXLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXIGXMXLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

1.43

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.57

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.70

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.26

-0.12

Drawdowns

MXIGX vs. MXLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXIGX drawdown since its inception was -66.36%, which is greater than MXLGX's maximum drawdown of -62.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIGX and MXLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIGXMXLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.36%

-62.98%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-14.95%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-20.74%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-38.07%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.70%

-38.07%

-5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

0.00%

-8.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.35%

-25.82%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

4.71%

-0.79%

Volatility

MXIGX vs. MXLGX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West International Growth Fund (MXIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) at 3.49%. This indicates that MXIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIGXMXLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.49%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

10.55%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

14.15%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

21.83%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

23.46%

-3.91%

MXIGX vs. MXLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXIGX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MXLGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXIGX vs. MXLGX - Dividend Comparison

MXIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than MXLGX's 12.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXIGX
Great-West International Growth Fund
4.95%5.13%2.80%0.00%1.29%7.13%0.88%0.20%13.16%3.77%
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
12.16%12.90%9.72%2.95%9.29%21.33%30.57%17.96%25.47%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXIGX and MXLGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXIGX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to MXLGX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIGX dropped -66.36% vs MXLGX's -62.98%.

MXLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXIGX and MXLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer