MXI vs. IVV
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXI is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Materials Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXI returned 11.38%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for IVV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
MXI vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MXI has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.38%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
IVV
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
MXI vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.20% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and IVV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2006 | 0.76 |
The correlation between MXI and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MXI vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXI
IVV
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
MXI
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
MXI
IVV
Consumer Defensive
MXI
IVV
Industrials
MXI
IVV
Communication Services
MXI
-
IVV
Energy
MXI
-
IVV
Financial Services
MXI
-
IVV
Healthcare
MXI
-
IVV
Real Estate
MXI
-
IVV
Technology
MXI
-
IVV
Utilities
MXI
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
IVV
MXI vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.68 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 11.98 | -4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -55.25% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -8.89% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -18.75% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -24.53% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -33.90% | -5.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -3.14% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -10.76% | -7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 1.99% | +2.20% |
Volatility
MXI vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.88%. This indicates that MXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 4.88% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 9.85% | +8.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 12.48% | +8.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 16.98% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 18.07% | +2.35% |
MXI vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and IVV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXI has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to IVV (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.58% vs 11.38% for MXI. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.
MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.11% for IVV.
MXI is categorized as Materials, while IVV is S&P 500. MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXI and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer