MXI vs. DVXB
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) are both Materials funds - MXI tracks the S&P Global Materials Index while DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXB.
Performance
MXI vs. DVXB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than DVXB's 15.59% return.
MXI
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 21.70%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
DVXB
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MXI vs. DVXB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 9.37% | 9.83% |
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 15.59% | -6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and DVXB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. DVXB — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
DVXB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MXI vs. DVXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. DVXB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, which is greater than DVXB's maximum drawdown of -19.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and DVXB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -19.77% | -48.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.31% | -12.42% | +3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.01% | -7.31% | -10.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | — | — |
Volatility
MXI vs. DVXB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 30.57% | -9.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 30.57% | -10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 30.57% | -10.18% |
MXI vs. DVXB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXB's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. DVXB - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.75% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and DVXB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.89% for DVXB.
Find the right allocation for MXI and DVXB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer