PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXHYX vs. MXLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXHYX vs. MXLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West High Yield Bond Fund (MXHYX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MXHYX having a 6.05% return and MXLGX slightly lower at 5.85%. Over the past 10 years, MXHYX has underperformed MXLGX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while MXLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.29% annualized return.


MXHYX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.82%
YTD
6.05%
6M
6.37%
1Y
11.95%
3Y*
10.08%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
4.85%

MXLGX

1D
0.36%
1M
2.22%
YTD
5.85%
6M
4.34%
1Y
18.42%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
16.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXHYX vs. MXLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXHYX
Great-West High Yield Bond Fund
6.05%8.95%7.64%11.14%-11.80%3.65%10.77%14.40%-3.79%3.63%
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
5.85%13.93%25.30%33.43%-34.08%41.30%40.72%36.20%-0.47%28.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXHYX and MXLGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2003

0.47

Over the past year, MXHYX and MXLGX have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXHYX vs. MXLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXHYX
MXHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MXHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MXHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MXLGX
MXLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MXLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXHYX vs. MXLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West High Yield Bond Fund (MXHYX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXHYXMXLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.24

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

1.28

+2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.76

3.97

+13.80

MXHYX vs. MXLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the MXLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXHYX and MXLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXHYXMXLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.35

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.55

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.70

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.26

-0.10

Drawdowns

MXHYX vs. MXLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXHYX drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, smaller than the maximum MXLGX drawdown of -62.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXHYX and MXLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXHYXMXLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.32%

-62.98%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-14.95%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.28%

-20.74%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.23%

-38.07%

+21.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.28%

-38.07%

+16.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.18%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.49%

-25.81%

+9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

4.71%

-4.02%

Volatility

MXHYX vs. MXLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West High Yield Bond Fund (MXHYX) is 1.79%, while Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that MXHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXHYXMXLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

3.48%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.93%

10.56%

-6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.77%

14.15%

-9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.74%

21.82%

-16.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.20%

23.45%

-17.25%

MXHYX vs. MXLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXHYX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MXLGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXHYX vs. MXLGX - Dividend Comparison

MXHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than MXLGX's 12.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXHYX
Great-West High Yield Bond Fund
4.39%4.65%4.19%5.45%3.46%3.14%3.66%5.37%8.16%3.37%
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
12.19%12.90%9.72%2.95%9.29%21.33%30.57%17.96%25.47%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXHYX and MXLGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLGX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to MXHYX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXHYX dropped -53.32% vs MXLGX's -62.98%.

MXHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXHYX and MXLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer