MXGNX vs. DRILX
MXGNX (Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund) and DRILX (Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, MXGNX returned 7.51%/yr vs 11.20%/yr for DRILX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXGNX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DRILX.
Performance
MXGNX vs. DRILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MXGNX having a 10.84% return and DRILX slightly lower at 10.64%.
MXGNX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- —
DRILX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 22.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
MXGNX vs. DRILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXGNX Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund | 10.84% | 17.97% | 10.55% | 17.34% | -17.97% | 16.08% | 13.72% | 9.75% |
DRILX Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund | 10.64% | 19.66% | 17.10% | 21.37% | -15.28% | 21.08% | 14.10% | 9.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXGNX and DRILX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between MXGNX and DRILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXGNX vs. DRILX — Risk / Return Rank
MXGNX
DRILX
MXGNX vs. DRILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund (MXGNX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXGNX | DRILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.89 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | 12.26 | -3.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXGNX vs. DRILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXGNX drawdown since its inception was -31.98%, roughly equal to the maximum DRILX drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXGNX and DRILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXGNX | DRILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.98% | -33.48% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -8.58% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -15.76% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.60% | -23.50% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -1.55% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -4.22% | -3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.95% | +0.29% |
Volatility
MXGNX vs. DRILX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund (MXGNX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXGNX | DRILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 4.77% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 9.67% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.24% | 11.84% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 14.95% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 15.68% | +2.42% |
MXGNX vs. DRILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXGNX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than DRILX's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXGNX vs. DRILX - Dividend Comparison
MXGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than DRILX's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRILX Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund | 1.82% | 1.47% | 2.40% | 3.26% | 3.97% | 2.25% | 2.11% | 2.12% | 2.25% | 0.91% | 1.96% |
MXGNX Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund | 6.57% | 7.28% | 6.42% | 4.74% | 7.99% | 8.55% | 5.26% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXGNX and DRILX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXGNX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to DRILX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXGNX dropped -31.98% vs DRILX's -33.48%.
DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXGNX and DRILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer